Home
$1 =
 31.6247 RUR
+0.2444
€1 =
 39.7681 RUR
+0.003
Search the Archives:
Today is May 25, 2012 8:50 PM (GMT +0400) Moscow
Forum  |  Archive  |  Photo  |  Advertising  |  Subscribe  |  Search  |  PDA  |  RUS
VISA
News
Open Gallery...
Mr Bezrukov’s argument was that when connecting to the Unlimited Tariff Rate he couldn’t have foreseen that, during half a year, an operator would limit the number of calls and hike the subscriber fee by 30 percent with no special reasons.
Photo: Vyacheslav Reutov
Other Photos
Open Gallery... Open Gallery... Open Gallery...  
News
Ad Market to Dip in 2009
Alcohol Supervisor to Be Set Into Motion ...
Gazprom Builds Big Gas Reservoir
Russia Terminated Armament Projects with ...
Georgian Opposition from New York
Readers' Opinions
You are welcome to share your opinion on the issue.
Apr. 23, 2007
Print  |  E-mail  |  Home
MTS Yields to Client
First time in judicial practice of Russia, a subscriber succeeded in court in enforcing the fee reduction on a cellular company. Sverdlov courts upheld the MTS client, revived initial tariff rate and ordered MTS to refund the excess amount. The analysts say MTS will be more cautious in future when changing the fees.
MTS clients in the Sverdlov Region are lodging claims to the local office of this cellular operator. They had subscribed to Unlimited Tariff Rate of MTS, but its fee surged 30 percent October 9, 2006 and a two-minute limit was introduced for the local calls, actually striping the rate of its unlimited advantage. The number of this tariff rate’s subscribers exceeds 1,200, according to the Sverdlov Region’s Bar.

The root cause of such activity of the cheated subscribers is the case won by lawyer Anatoly Bezrukov. Octyabrsky Regional Court of Yekaterinburg upheld him December 20, 2006, committing MTS to revive initial terms of the contract and refund excessive payments of at least 1,000 rubles. The award took effect once sustained by the Civil-Law Panel of the Sverdlov Region's Court on April 5.

Mr Bezrukov’s argument was that when connecting to Unlimited Tariff Rate he couldn’t have foreseen that, during half a year, an operator would limit the number of calls and hike the subscriber fee by 30 percent with no special reasons. His victory has established a precedent in the legal practice in Russia. In late past year, the country’s cellular operators were aggressively revising the tariff rates when shifting to “the caller must pay procedures” and hiking the price of the first minute in most cases.
www.kommersant.com

All the Article in Russian as of Apr. 23, 2007

Print  |  E-mail  |  Home

Forum  |  Archives  |   Photo  |  About Us  |  Editorial  |  E-Editorial  |  Advertising  |  Subscribe  |  Subscribe to Printed Editions  |  Contact Us  |  RSS
© 1991-2012 ZAO "Kommersant. Publishing House". All rights reserved.