Home
$1 =
 31.6247 RUR
+0.2444
€1 =
 39.7681 RUR
+0.003
Search the Archives:
Today is May 25, 2012 06:59 AM (GMT +0400) Moscow
Forum  |  Archive  |  Photo  |  Advertising  |  Subscribe  |  Search  |  PDA  |  RUS
FORD
Documents
Open Gallery... Photo: Ivan Makeev
Other Photos
Open Gallery... Open Gallery...  
Documents
Politics Are a Guarantee
Russian Church to Elect New Patriarch
Serbia Lets the Gas In
Russia Determines OSCE Agenda
A Prime Minister Talks to the Public
Readers' Opinions
You are welcome to share your opinion on the issue.
Aug. 11, 2006
Print  |  E-mail  |  Home
Economic Prognosis for August
// The Meeting of G8 Leaders in St. Petersburg Was July's Main Economic Event
August has arrived, and Vlast, as usual, is offering its economic prognosis for the month ahead. Experts answer questions on the following topics: how the exchange rate of the dollar will change on the Russian currency market, the projected rate of inflation, the expected price of oil on the world market, and how the dollar and euro will behave. Following tradition, however, we will first remark on July's major economic event.
The meeting of G8 leaders in Petersburg in July should be considered the main economic event of the month. This was the first time in history that the leaders of the world's leading industrialized powers have gathered in Russia. Of course, today is no longer the 1970s or the 1980s, when such meetings set the exchange rates for the world's leading currencies and thus intimately influenced the daily lives of businessmen and ordinary citizens around the globe (including, strangely enough, those in the USSR, whose economy was built in significant part on imports; besides this, many Soviet citizens worked abroad and received their salaries in hard currency). For the meeting in July Russia, unwilling to be outdone, did everything possible to prepare, and these preparations imparted economic significance to the proceedings.

In particular, as part of the preparations for the meeting of G8 leaders, the Russian government on July 1 lifted restrictions on the movement of capital across the country's borders, noting that this ensures that the Russian ruble is freely convertible. Actually, restrictions on currency under current conditions would seem to be an anachronism, since proponents of such restrictions in today's world are few (an obvious example being China), and the removal of these restrictions moves Russia closer to its G8 partners. However, it should be pointed out that, for the ruble to be truly freely convertible in the sense that Russian citizens can take rubles abroad, it is necessary that banks, currency conversion points, and stores around the world accept the ruble without batting an eye, and there is a long way to go until that point is reached. Banks should use the rubles that they receive from Russian citizens, but this requires consistent demand for rubles from foreign citizens and companies. In general, since Soviet times Russian leaders have always ascribed too much significance to their understanding of "freely convertible hard currency," assuming that this describes dollars, pounds, or Swiss francs. However, there are many more freely convertible hard currencies in the world, and the three enumerated above are not only freely convertible but also the world's leading hard currencies. In order to achieve similar status, it is not sufficient to remove restrictions on currency – one still needs centuries of tradition. For a period of time after WWII, the British pound was not completely freely convertible, but it nevertheless remained the world's most important currency. Everyone remembered the importance of the pound in the 19th century and before WWII and knew that Great Britain would sooner or later bounce back and remove the restrictions, restoring demand for the pound even as the currency ceded its role as the world's most important hard currency to the American dollar. The Russian ruble under the tsar could have rightfully been considered a freely convertible hard currency, but the ruble has never been a leading global currency – it is hard to imagine German or English firms dealing with each other in terms of Russian rubles, whatever the ruble's content of solid gold may have been. Thus, despite its trumpeting of the new status of convertibility for the ruble, Russia will continue to remain apart from the other countries of the G8, all of whom have currencies of leading global importance (with the possible exception of Canada, with its Canadian dollars).

It is clear that the appearance on the Western market of shares in the state oil company Rosneft is also linked to the G8 summit. The Russian government has done everything possible to ensure that the West, in the race for profit, remains, so to speak, a minority shareholder in the Russian oil industry and that it does not overly object to the industry becoming more and more state-owned. How can you, the thinking goes, be indignant if you yourselves are taking part in and receiving dividends from the process? In the course of the summit, President Vladimir Putin did not forget to point out, with obvious pleasure, to British Prime Minister Tony Blair that British capital has been especially active in purchasing a large number of shares in Rosneft. Russian oligarchs have also snapped up many shares – the West can now draw the conclusion that the Russian governmental sector and large-scale Russian capital funds live and work in tandem in the name of shared national goals. The Rosneft action (meaning also the G8 meeting) also had an influence on Russians' daily lives. Having come to a savings bank branch to pay bills for municipal services, elderly ladies discovered with amazement that they could also use the opportunity to buy shares in the Russian oil company, thus becoming capitalists.

Finally, Russia took advantage of the Petersburg meeting to unambiguously air its grievances with regard to its share in the global system of energy distribution. Foreign capitalist gentlemen, it seemed to say, if you want to invest money in the extraction of Russia's energy resources, for your part please be so kind as to allow Russia into your markets for the consumption of these resources. This will ensure both your and our energy security. Words about energy security resounded most effectively in connection with the fact that, in the period immediately preceding the summit, global oil prices reached a new all-time high as a result of the events unfolding in Lebanon. Russia perhaps did not manage to fully express its complaints to the West, but the flow of petrodollars flooding Russia's economy has noticeably increased in conjunction with the intensification of the international situation. And this has also been a distinctive consequence of the G8 meeting.


   &
Economic Forecasts

1. What will happen with the ruble's rate of exchange?

In July the dollar depreciated on the Russian currency market: as of July 1, the official rate of exchange of the American dollar was 26.94 rubles, while on August 1 the rate was 26.82. Although the fall of the dollar against the ruble did not appear to be especially significant (from time to time the dollar even rose, reaching above 27 rubles), it is clear that the Central Bank will continue to pursue its policy of strengthening the ruble.
That policy, of course, has its own justification. Since Russia on July 1 removed restrictions on the movement of capital and elevated the ruble to a fully convertible currency, it will be necessary to show that the hard ruble is not weaker than its predecessor and that it is stronger than non-free currencies, thus proving that liberalization carries no danger to the national currency. In addition, the Central Bank reiterated the notion that an increase in the exchange rate of the ruble constitutes an anti-inflationary measure – therefore even a serious strengthening of the Russian national currency with a simultaneous devaluation of the dollar could seem like a decisive blow to inflation on the consumer market. Finally, with the current record global price of oil, which in July reached unheard-of highs, the devaluation of the dollar appears to be natural: what else can be done if the flow of petrodollars into Russia continues to increase?

The strengthening of the ruble can also be read as an ideological strike. In July the State Duma scheduled a second reading of a bill that would make it illegal for government deputies and the media to discuss prices in dollars. Though the tone of the bill was softened somewhat before the second reading (for example, it will be permissible to indicate the amounts of deals between foreign firms in terms of foreign currencies), its spirit remains unchanged: it still dictates to journalists the form of currency in which they should supply economic information to their readers. If journalists must be forcibly weaned off speaking in dollars, what does that say about everyday citizens? By systematically devaluing the American currency, the government is forcing people to abandon it – and to turn instead to government gold reserves.

Our prediction: in August the campaign against the dollar will continue, and it will depreciate to 26.8 rubles.

2. What will happen with Russian prices?

Final inflation figures for July have not yet been calculated, but preliminary data from the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade (MEDT) indicates that inflation averaged 0.5-0.6%, since prices on the consumer market rose by 0.4% in the first seventeen days of the month. The MEDT attributed the increase in the rate of inflation since June, when it was 0.3%, to an increase in the growth rate of prices for foodstuffs like sugar, vegetables, and beverages. In any case, July inflation figures for this year are likely to turn out to be higher than in the past, when prices rose in July by 0.5%.

Assuming that inflation in July was 0.6%, prices for consumers during the first seven months of this year rose by 6.9%. In comparison with the first seven months of 2005, this would constitute significant progress, since the figure for that same period of 2005 was 8.5%. However, the implementation this year of a plan to deal with inflation presents many problems. According to the MEDT, "for the period of time between June 2005 and June 2006, inflation was 9.0%, which is already at the upper limit set for the whole of 2006 (8-9%)." In fact, in its plan the government had particular hope for July and August, forecasting that price growth could decline to 0% and even that overall deflation could occur. July thus presents an unpleasant surprise.

In the future, things could look even worse. Even with the relatively low rate of inflation recorded for June, all indications are that 0.3% is the base rate of inflation; i.e., it is inflation that results from monetary and currency factors, not an increase in administrative tariffs. The amount of money in Russia is growing at an accelerating rate, and in the future this will have an impact on the consumer market.

Our prediction: In August, prices will continue to rise, and inflation will be approximately 0.4%.

3. What will happen with the global price of oil?

July saw the setting of another global record for high oil prices: in the middle of the month, in connection with Israel's military action in Lebanon and with the danger that the conflict could touch Syria and Iran, American WTI fetched almost $80 a barrel, at a price of $78.40. Russian Urals set its own record as the first in history to exceed $72 a barrel. Towards the end of July oil seemed set to become slightly cheaper, but then prices again took off, at the beginning of August exceeding the mark of $76 per barrel set by North Sea Brent.

There are many other reasons for the appreciation of oil besides the conflict in Lebanon. Iran is not moving to cease its nuclear program, and in the event of international sanctions it could, as many players in the hard currency market fear, strike an answering blow by blockading the Strait of Hormuz, the conduit through which oil moves en route to Japan, the United States, and Western Europe. Disorder in Nigeria continues to curtail extraction of its oil. In the United States, the automobile season is at its peak (as Americans leave for vacations in their cars, demand for oil only increases) and the hurricane season is approaching: it is expected that Hurricane Chris has impacted the oil-producing power of the Gulf of Mexico.

As usual the International Energy Agency, pooling the emergency reserves of the leading industrialized nations, promises to fill gaps in the oil supply that result from any kind of catastrophe, as it did last year in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. However, the agency traditionally refuses to intervene to simply bring down oil prices.

Our prediction: as a result of the many factors that influence the growth of oil prices, in August oil prices will be higher than $74 a barrel.

4. What will happen with the exchange rate of the dollar against the euro?

In July the exchange rates of the dollar and the euro on the world currency market suffered significant fluctuations. On June 30 the European currency grew by more than 1%, to $1.278, after it became known that inflation in the United States was remaining extremely moderate and was not accelerating. Players in the market also knew that the Federal Reserve under Ben Bernanke was inclined to consider American inflation to be slowing down, another auspicious statistic. This means that the Federal Reserve will pause its interest rate hikes; if credit in the U.S. ceases to become more expensive, while in Europe it continues to rise, savings in dollars will become less profitable than those in euros.

On July 3 the exchange rate of the euro exceeded $1.28 on the strength of the news that the ISM index in the U.S. had fallen while the index in the countries of the euro zone had reached its highest point in six years. However, on July 12 the euro fell from $1.273 to $1.268 when it was discovered that the U.S. trade deficit for May was $63.8 billion instead of the expected $64.9 billion; in the meantime, the main danger for the dollar appears to be that the U.S. simply will not find the money to cover its outsized trade deficit.

Before July 19 the euro dipped below $1.25 since, in the conditions surrounding Israel's military activities in Lebanon and the extreme instability of the international situation, investors preferred dollars as the traditionally more reliable currency, and even more so since the U.S. is located farther than Europe from the zone of the Middle Eastern conflict. Additionally, Ben Bernanke gave indication that he will continue to keep an eye on inflation and will raise interest rates if necessary. In any case, however, the euro was back above $1.27 by the end of the month, thanks to a slowdown in U.S. economic growth. It was expected that economic growth in the U.S. would hit 3.2% of yearly calculations in the second quarter of this year, but in actuality the figure turned out to be only 2.5% – a sharp contrast to the brisk tempo of 5.6% growth achieved in the first quarter.

It is clear that marked fluctuations will continue in August. The international situation is far from calm, and in such a situation investors and speculators are rocked by their dependence on the daily appearance of statistical data.

Our prediction: the global currency market is in the grip of nervousness about the war, meaning that the exchange rate for the euro will be worth less than $1.28.



Sergei Minaev

All the Article in Russian as of Aug. 07, 2006

Print  |  E-mail  |  Home

Forum  |  Archives  |   Photo  |  About Us  |  Editorial  |  E-Editorial  |  Advertising  |  Subscribe  |  Subscribe to Printed Editions  |  Contact Us  |  RSS
© 1991-2012 ZAO "Kommersant. Publishing House". All rights reserved.